A (Not So) Tiny Letter
I've been reading a lot of letters. It seems all I do these days is read letters.
But here's a letter for you. I wish I could send it to you on the onion-skin I so often find myself reading, the translucent sheets etched with the black ink of a an old Hermes's or Corona Portable's hammer-strikes, the sheet carefully folded into an envelope covered with bright stamps and decorated with a picture of a DC-3 and bold capitals reading "VIA AIR MAIL."
Of course, I can't, but I still want to say hello, because it's been a while (probably) and I miss you (certainly) and connecting beyond the superficial digital zones where we encounter one another. You may know where I've been, but perhaps something will settle on this screen. Letters, whatever their substrate, allow thoughts to steep better than ever-flowing streams of information we feel we must address and process now. Right now. Always now.
So feel free to read this and whatever letters follow at your leisure.
Cooking Up Frustration
I understand – trust me I understand and kinda don't want to discuss – that the publishing world is rapidly changing. Even if it weren't, it takes time and patience to get something published. But I wonder about the rules of the game. With information spreading so rapidly how am I supposed to do this, to wait patiently on a story that is constantly evolving? Even if things go well with this story, how do we publish, how do we write or report anything? How do we set boundaries? Do we just say “that's the story” even as it continues to change? Do we just cut convenient slices of ever-lengthening timelines out?
Undercutting the competition
If publishers and other hiring managers want to succeed, they will need a committed, loyal and stable staff, and they must develop sharp, insightful contributors. An investment in skilled journalists ready to take risks to lead publications into the future is a wise choice. It may seem counter-intuitive to talk about investment in a time of economic malaise, but those who take such leaps of faith will be best positioned for future success. Those, however, who treat their content producers as chattel will continue to struggle to maintain a stable source of original content, and thus, they will spend all their time watching editors and writers leave for greener pastures while their competitors invest in competent, devoted teams passionate about the work their doing and the success of their organizations.
Search Posts
Archived Posts
- March 2024 1
- October 2023 1
- October 2022 2
- December 2017 1
- April 2017 1
- February 2017 1
- January 2017 1
- November 2016 2
- August 2016 2
- July 2016 2
- December 2015 1
- November 2015 2
- September 2015 3
- April 2015 1
- March 2015 1
- February 2015 1
- January 2015 4
- August 2014 1
- May 2014 1
- April 2014 4
- March 2014 6
- December 2013 1
- November 2013 1
- August 2013 3
- May 2013 2
- April 2013 1
- December 2012 3
- November 2012 2
- October 2012 2
- September 2012 3
- August 2012 6
- July 2012 4
- June 2012 1
- May 2012 6
- April 2012 2
- March 2012 3
- January 2012 2
- September 2011 2
- August 2011 2
- July 2011 1
- May 2011 9
- April 2011 2
- March 2011 1
- January 2011 2
- November 2010 1
- October 2010 1
- August 2010 3
- July 2010 1
- June 2010 1
- May 2010 12
- April 2010 2
- March 2010 1
- January 2010 1
- December 2009 1
- November 2009 4
- October 2009 2
- September 2009 2
- August 2009 1
- July 2009 1
- June 2009 4
- May 2009 1
- March 2009 5
- February 2009 4