New rankings beg question: what makes Portland sustainable?
Can our ability to live healthily, prosperously and durably over multiple generations (my rough definition of sustainability) be gauged by simply totaling up new construction and how many gizmos it features, dollars spent, and the new kilowatt-hour reducing technology we build? Or should our analysis be a little more complex? Should we explore our actual behaviors, i.e., the actual effectiveness of the programs we incent, the way our buildings - LEED or not - get used and the type of demands we place on our power grid? Wouldn't that be the real measure of sustainability?
My un-scientific, un-journalistic assumption is that Portland would probably end up pretty far ahead on that sort of scale as well, but we -- everyone, but particularly journalists reporting on the environment -- might be well served by asking these sort of questions.
Portland-based Sustainable Business Oregon reported yesterday that Stumptown once again won silver in Site Selection Magazine's Rankings of the nation's most sustainable metropolitan communities.
Once again coming in second to the Bay Area (Site Selection's lede about San Francisco's ban on unsolicited Yellow Pages was cornily fantastic), Portland ranked high alongside Oregon, which came in third on the list of "Top Sustainable States." Congratulations!
But is praise premature? Subjectively, we're probably not going out on a limb to gauge Portland and its neighbors among the nation's most sustainable communities. There exists here an unquantifiable, do-it-yourself, simple approach I like to call Portland's "Pot-luck" culture, where many groups bring their diverse skills and resources to the table. We're all now quite well aware of the bike culture and transportation alternatives and ecoroofs and every other bright green badge of pride we wear. Meanwhile, as I detailed in the May, 2011 issue of Biocycle (Subscription Required) Portland has many more concrete sustainable projects in food scraps composting, urban gardening and new, private efforts like the upcoming June Key Delta Community Center (which was featured in a sidebar with the Biocycle story).
Nevertheless, are we measuring sustainability properly here, or anywhere? To rank the top metro areas, Site Selection used the number and per capita rate of LEED Certified green building projects, the extent of green incentives and amount of manufacturing and other facilities involved in renewables and green industry. Can our ability to live healthily, prosperously and durably over multiple generations (my rough definition of sustainability) be gauged by simply totaling up new construction and how many gizmos it features, dollars spent, and the new kilowatt-hour reducing technology we build? Or should our analysis be a little more complex? Should we explore our actual behaviors, i.e., the actual effectiveness of the programs we incent, the way our buildings - LEED or not - get used and the type of demands we place on our power grid? Wouldn't that be the real measure of sustainability?
My un-scientific, un-journalistic assumption is that Portland would probably end up pretty far ahead on that sort of scale as well, but we -- everyone, but particularly journalists reporting on the environment -- might be well served by asking these sort of questions.
What do you think? Are we measuring sustainability properly? Is Portland "Green?" What do you think is the most sustainable community?
Let me know in the comments
Search Posts
Archived Posts
- March 2024 1
- October 2023 1
- October 2022 2
- December 2017 1
- April 2017 1
- February 2017 1
- January 2017 1
- November 2016 2
- August 2016 2
- July 2016 2
- December 2015 1
- November 2015 2
- September 2015 3
- April 2015 1
- March 2015 1
- February 2015 1
- January 2015 4
- August 2014 1
- May 2014 1
- April 2014 4
- March 2014 6
- December 2013 1
- November 2013 1
- August 2013 3
- May 2013 2
- April 2013 1
- December 2012 3
- November 2012 2
- October 2012 2
- September 2012 3
- August 2012 6
- July 2012 4
- June 2012 1
- May 2012 6
- April 2012 2
- March 2012 3
- January 2012 2
- September 2011 2
- August 2011 2
- July 2011 1
- May 2011 9
- April 2011 2
- March 2011 1
- January 2011 2
- November 2010 1
- October 2010 1
- August 2010 3
- July 2010 1
- June 2010 1
- May 2010 12
- April 2010 2
- March 2010 1
- January 2010 1
- December 2009 1
- November 2009 4
- October 2009 2
- September 2009 2
- August 2009 1
- July 2009 1
- June 2009 4
- May 2009 1
- March 2009 5
- February 2009 4